The Female Physique Webzine/Gallery


THE JAN TANA CLASSIC 2003
Blumenthal Performing Arts Center
Charlotte, N.C. - August 13-14
back


CONTEST REPORTS


INTRODUCTION
The Jan Tana Classic has been one of the most important female physique events – and one of the most under-appreciated – since Jan promoted the first Classic in 1991 (which was won by Sue Gafner). The most pretigious contests for women bodybuilders are the IFBB Ms. Olympia and the Schwarzenegger/Lorimer produced Ms. International. But pro competitors have to start somewhere to qualify for the Olympia and to attempt to receive special invitations to the Arnold. Since the Jan Tana is open to all IFBB women pros, it is the major avenue for would-be champions from all over the world to earn their way to the bigger international events.

As new types of physique competition for women have been created, Jan has included them in the Classic. She added fitness to the competition in 1995, with Monica Brant winning the inaugural event. In 2003, the IFBB began sanctioning figure competition and this year’s Classic responded with a contest for the figure women as well. As a result, the audience in Charlotte was treated to the spectacle of more than 200 of the most beautiful female bodies in the world featuring competitors from 27 different countries.

There is a friendly informality about the Jan Tana Classic that has made the event very popular with the women competitors and audience alike. There is much less stress and pressure involved than in Columbus or Las Vegas. And the opportunity to meet the competitors “up close and personal” is much greater at the Jan Tana than at a venue like the Olympia – where access to the women tends to be limited to occasions like the super-crowded Expo, where they are behind tables signing and selling photos and tend to be constantly bombarded by the attention of fans. The after-contest banquet at the Olympia has a VIP area set up to isolate the bodybuilding stars from the public; at the Jan Tana banquet, there is no such separation between fans and competitors. so the female physique stars are far more accessible.

Jan should also be commended for continuing to support female bodybuilding all these years, unlike the GNC Show of Strength which is dropping female bodybuilding in 2003 in favor of figure. So much for GNC’s commitment to athletics for women. Fans of female physique should keep in mind that there are other places to buy supplements than GNC.

In 2003, the Classic was held in Charlotte, N.C. at the Blumenthal Performing Arts Center, featuring a very modern theater with excellent lighting. In the past, Jan has staged the Classic in Lynchburg, VA, a city much more difficult to get to and which provided far from ideal contest facilities. Unfortunately for sponsors, the area in which the booths were set up at this year's show was at the adjacent Omni Hotel rather than the theater, which meant many ticket holders were totally unaware there was an “expo” at all.

BODYBUILDING

Like the recent Night of Champions women’s bodybuilding contest, the women bodybuilders at the Jan Tana competing in three classes, rather than two as at the Arnold and the Ms. Olympia. Weight classes for female pros is a great idea (and one the men should be considering as well) but having only two classes means, in effect, the lightweights and middleweights are grouped into a single competitive group, which puts the smaller women at a great disadvantage. If the IFBB truly wants to encourage smaller women to compete as pros it needs to provide them with their own class. In fact, when there is a true lightweight class there is a definite possibility that some of the more muscular fitness/figure women would be tempted to cross over.

But in doing so they would have their work cut out for them, if the lineup of competitors at the Jan Tana 2003 is any indication.

THE LIGHTWEIGHTS
Looking at the lightweight lineup, it was difficult to realize that the heaviest of these women was only 129 lbs. This is one of the great benefits of having weight classes – and especially including a lightweight division. The judges can choose between apples and apples rather than apples and oranges.

Certainly, looking at class winner Angela DeBatin of Brazil without a much bigger competitor beside her there is no reason to think of her as “small.” Angela is beautifully proportioned and was in great shape at the Jan Tana ’03. Angela finished 6th at the Night of Champions and 3rd at last year’s Arnold. What made the difference? “I was certainly in great shape this year,” she said. “But I think I was also able to impress the judges because I made an effort to really hit and hold my poses this time. In the past, I think I was trying to be too ‘feminine’ and was afraid to flex hard enough.”

Second place went to Joanna Thomas of England, who won this class two years ago. The problem she had this year was conditioning. “I’ve made some good gains in the past two years,” Joanna explained, “but I’m afraid I’ve tended to get too heavy off season, which makes getting in great contest shape that much more difficult. My goal now is to continue to develop my physique but to stay leaner all year around so that I can absolutely nail my next contest diet.”

THE MIDDLEWEIGHTS
There is no doubt that Haitian-born and Canadian-raised Dayana Cadeau has become the Flex Wheeler of female bodybuilding. There are few female bodybuilders who have the incredible fullness of muscle shape and symmetry that you see with Dayana’s physique. Fans are constantly amazed that she only weighed 132 pounds at the Jan Tana. It goes to illustrate the truth of what the late Vince Gironda had to say on this subject: “Bodybuilding is illusion.”

Dayana is a Ms. International winner who would have more titles except for one weakness: Her physique is so full that she has to work very hard at conditioning to bring her waist down sufficiently. When she does – as she did at the Jan Tana, displaying an impressive V-shape symmetry to her torso – she is difficult to beat. The judges in North Carolina had her winning every round and finishing 20 points ahead of the runner-up.

Her only fault at the contest (as used to be true of Angela DeBatin) was a tendency not to flex hard enough and hold her poses. In the more competitive Ms. Olympia lineup this could work to her disadvantage. “I know I always have to be learning and getting better,” is how Dayana responds. “So if flexing harder to show the judges more muscularity and definition is what I need to do, I will certainly work on that.”

Mah-Ann Mendoza placed second, looking the best she ever has. Mah-Ann is one of those bodybuilders who doesn’t rely on flashy genetics but simply works to create a balanced, symmetrical physique and to show up in the best shape possible. She has looked better in virtually ever pro appearance and if she continues to do so will become an even greater threat to take titles away from her rivals.

Vilma Caez placed third and was awarded a $1000 prize as best poser by women’s physique editor and photographer Steve Wennerstrom. Of course, it helps that Vilma has a lot to pose with – since her solid and symmetrical muscularity is very impressive, indeed.

THE HEAVYWEIGHTS

Every once in a while a relatively unknown competitor show up at a contest and sends shock waves through the sport. That happened when Lenda Murray won the IFBB North American Championships and immediately became a leading contender for the Ms. Olympia title. At the Jan Tana Classic this year the same thing could be said of Helle Nielsen of Denmark – who may turn out to be a very Great Dane indeed.

Helle (who was the biggest in the class finalists at 152 pounds – there were no giants among this year’s top 5) displayed the same kind of hard, chiseled muscularity and definition you see with a competitor like Iris Kyle in her best shape. Helle showed a kind of “flayed alive” anatomical detail that we’ve come to expect from the male pros but don’t see that often with the women - plus looking so hard she might be made out of bronze rather than flesh and muscle. Helle is planning to compete in the Ms. Olympia in November and if she is able to turn around her diet on such short notice and handle the pressure of jumping up into the big time so quickly, she will definitely be a contender among the heavyweights.

“ I had hoped to do well at the Jan Tana,” she explained, “but I really hadn’t any big expectations of winning and becoming qualified for the Ms. Olympia. I’m going to have to change all my plans for the year but I’ll do my best. This is biggest opportunity of my bodybuilding career and I hope to make the most of it.”

Beth Roberts finished second and seems to be adopting a more colorful and flamboyant approach to her presentation. Her finals costume appeared to consist of a fetish-like black studded bikini with wrist cuffs and a collar – all very dramatic when set off by her muscular physique and blonde hair. As Beth points out, there is a lot more to becoming a success a a pro bodybuilder than just hard training and diet - although you can't do without those either.

Another big surprise in the show was Maria Callo. Bodybuilding audiences have never seen this version of Maria – lean and muscular, extremely symmetrical and looking like much more of a complete aesthetic package than ever before. Hitting traditional shots like the archer pose, Maria on stage was able to duplicate the impressive look she’s achieved in studio photos that caused me to call her “The Female Hercules.” Maria has always had the muscle but her improvement in overall aesthetics was a very impressive achievement, indeed.

THE OVERALL
The overall was primarily (as happens so often) essentially between the two bigger women in the posedown: heavyweight Helle Nielsen and middleweight Dayana Cadeau. Helle outweighed Dayana by 20 pounds (152 to 132) and being in such incredibly good shape was probably the unanimous victor (although it would be nice if the IFBB would publish scores from the overall round). Dayana, in some ways, had the more aesthetic physique – at least in terms of full, sensuous (or maybe better said “voluptuous”) muscle but she simply doesn’t wasn't hard enough to compete directly against somebody who looked as if she'd been carved out of granite
.
Given that both these women are ambitious and intent on improving over time, no doubt we will eventually see Helle become more full and just as hard and Dayana just as full and a lot harder. There are limits to how good you can get as a bodybuilder but there should be no limits on how hard you try to improve.

FITNESS/FIGURE

As usual, my approach to reporting on fitness and figure doesn’t involve a round by round review of the judging – since these events don’t have the same level of objective criteria you find (or should find) in bodybuilding competition. Fitness and figure are not “just” beauty contests, but since they aren’t true sports (in the sense of testing the limits of human ability) nor really athletic competitions (fitness has an athletic component but not one that is clearly defined) the most accurate description of them is probably “specialized” beauty contest in which the aesthetics of the bodies being judges are the result to at least some degree of athletic effort. So fitness and figure competitors are athletes involved in competitions that are essentially non-athletic and which are judged as such.

Of course, in reality what fitness and figure are underneath all the rhetoric are bodybuilding contests for women who aren’t supposed to look too much like bodybuilders. Even since fitness began, the IFBB and NPC have been in opposition to the fact that women training with weights over time are going to get more muscular. The result, whether they like it or not, is that the competitors tend to keep getting more muscular to the point where a Timea Majorova or Monica Brant (and several others) could move over and compete successfully as lightweight bodybuilders with very little effort (in some ways less effort, since they wouldn’t have to work so hard in the effort to lose muscle mass).

Bodybuilding evolves over time as the top competitors managed to achieve greater degrees of aesthetic muscular development. Fitness – and now figure – don’t evolve. They just “change” as the competitors get bigger and more muscular because of all the bodybuilding-type training they do (but still mostly remain way below their genetic limits) and the judges either get used to it and accept it or are asked to follow judging standards intended to limit this kind of development.

FITNESS
The lineup of the fitness competition at the Jan Tana this year did not contain the “usual subjects” who have been at the top in most IFBB pro fitness shows. No Susan Curray, Adela Friedmansky, Kelly Ryan, Jen Hendershott and the like – most of whom dominate by virtue of their gymnastic ability. In fact, while winner Stacey Greenwood turned in a credibly performance, nobody would confuse her with a Bela Karolyi gymnastics pupil (although Stacey is definitely a fitness competitor who could move to bodybuilding if she chose).

No doubt it will be business as usual at the Fitness Olympia, but it is clear that fitness is in a period of change. The NPC has allowed the demand for gymnastics excellence to drive most fitness competitors into figure and there are fewer and fewer amateur fitness women coming up through the pipeline. The judges at the 2003 NPC USA were much more tolerant of non-gymnastics routines in the scoring but unless a very public and well publicized policy change is instituted we may be seeing the eventual demise of fitness. The NPC has also announced there will be no more fitness in the Team Universe as of 2004.

Of coure, the fitness competitors at the Jan Tana were adept and entertaining as ever. And accept for Jennifer Hanke dislocating her shoulder during her routine there were no serious injuries or other disasters. And the audience seem to accept the outcome with good grace. Who could complain about the faces or bodies of
Stacey Greenwood (1st),
Stacy Hylton (2nd) or
Kimberly Scheidler-Klein (3rd)?

But it seems doubtful that anyone would have protested if the finishing order were somehow scrambled. Such is the nature of fitness.

FIGURE
This is the first year the IFBB has held figure contests so it remains to be seen what this kind of event develops into. The first few pro contests were, to a large degree, won by women who looked very much like models rather than converted fitness competitors - such as Jenny Lynn and Davana Medina. At the Jan Tana, the top competitors seemed to be somewhat more muscular, although we've seen women with muscle like Monica Brant and Elaine Goodlad to well (although not win) in recent figure contests. This is not that evident to the audience, which is sitting some distance away and doesn’t get a close look at the physiques on stage. To those of us in the press pit – especially looking at the competitors through telephoto lenses – the fact that they have a lot of muscle, however small, is much more clear. (Check out the extensive photos of the event in the subscriber area and you’ll agree)
.
The winner of the figure event was Dina Al-Sabah. Dina, interestingly enough, was a bodybuilder first, then switched to fitness and finally to figure. She certainly looks more like a proto-bodybuilder than the figure winners at the Arnold or Night of Champions. Second place D.J. Wallis has always looked to me like somebody who should be a bodybuilder if the world were a perfect place. She was very happy to finish runner up after being placed a disappointing 17th at NOC just a few months earlier.

How do you go from 17th to 2nd almost overnight? You don’t – if there are any objective criteria to go by. Thus endeth the lesson. But D.J. is so spectacular that it’s easy to conclude that the JanTana judges simply did a better job than those in New York.

I was personally glad to see Aleksandra Kobielak finish in the top 5 after being overlooked as she was in pro fitness events. If the IFBB follows the lead of the NPC and stops putting so much emphasis on tumbling in the scoring it would be nice to see Aleksandra back on stage doing her dramatic and theatrical fitness performance routine. In the meantime, she’ll have to settle for getting some recognition as having an outstanding physique and overall aesthetic appeal.

One disappointment was seeing former Yugoslavian Bodybuilding and Fitness Champion Danijela Crevar in a figure contest when her muscle mass and shape dictate she definitely needs to be competing in bodybuilding. Danijela should take finishing in a multiple tie for 19th place as an indication of what type of event she is best suited for. Hopefully, we’ll be seeing her shortly in IFBB pro bodybuilding competition.

By the way, if there were a Miss Geniality or a Best Personality award it would have to go to 4th place Theil Bradford, who seems constantly to be bubbling with good nature and energy. The fact that she is also cute as a bug helps create an even bigger impression – much like that of the spectacular Alphie Newman in her prime as a teenage bodybuilder and fitness champion. Charisma is one of those things that are difficult to fake – and which comes in very handy to those competing in an event based so significantly on subjective criteria.

IN CONCLUSION

The Jan Tana Classic for 2003 was very significant on a number of levels. It certain produced some high levels of competition. Both Helle Nielsen and Dayana Cadeau will be serious contenders to win their classes at the upcoming Ms. Olympia. Tracey Greenwood proved you can win a major IFBB fitness event without emphasizing tumbling in your performance. Figure winner Dina Al-Sabah has opened up competition possibilities for women who are former bodybuilders and not necessarily tall, leggy model types.

There is still the question of why so many rounds are necessary in fitness and figure. What is the point of having a physique contest in which the competitors are judged wearing bikinis and then come back out in one-piece suits that cover up their torsos? The result of this is an audience having to sit through endless quarters turns that quickly become extremely boring. Especially to the judges. They shouldn't need more than one physique round with the women wearing bikinis to decide how the lineup should be scored.

These IFBB women's shows are becoming interminably long. At the Night of Champions a few months ago, by the end of the evening show the women were being rushed around the stage until they looked like a speeded-up silent movie. At the Classic, which also included the IFBB Masters Mr. Olympia, the finals were a full 6 1/2 hours long! (And women's and men's judging was intermixed, meaning those only interested in the women had to sit through the men and vice versa.) Jan Tana may have to consider makes some changes in this competition schedule.

There will only be two weight classes for women's bodybuilding at the Olympia, and the reason no doubt has to do with the time involved in staging three, time-consuming events.. But why should female bodybuilding competition be compromised - with the lightweight women being forced to compete in the same class as the middleweights - in order to accomodate too many rounds of a physique beauty contest?

Another question is prize money. In general, the fitness and figure women are winning the same prize money as the bodybuilders. But female bodybuilding has been sanctioned by the IFBB for 23 years, it takes a very long time to develop a pro bodybuilding physique and (in spite of opinions to the contrary) the FBBs have earned a substantial and very loyal following willing to pay to see them compete. Should the IFBB be giving the same prize money to a fitness model entering a type of physique beauty contest that is in its first year of existence as it does to a seasoned, world-famous female bodybuilding champion? Certainly, nobody who is familiar with what it takes to be a pro bodybuilder would equate the achievement of these women with the effort it takes to compete in figure - no matter how obviously attractive such a competitor might be.

At least for the time being, there seems to be more work in the fitness industry for the women who compete in fitness and figure - and therefore more opportunity to create income from the exposure they get from competition. To give them prize money on top of that which is disproportionate to their level of effort and achievement compared to FBBs seems grossly unfair.

COMPLETE PHOTO COVERAGE IN
SUBSCRIBER AREA